
Photo by sunrise100(deuce)
Shaun Boyd at LifeReboot.com has written about how he recently accepted that nothing he writes will ever be perfect. Falling into the common trap of obsessing over perfection, he scrapped a lot of posts that were probably excellent because he found something wrong with each one. Then he received this comment from a reader:
“well, after almost a month with no new posts, i’m forced to unsubscribe. it’s a shame – this blog had a lot of potential.”
Shaun acknowledged the comment, then responded by writing a post the next day, and another one four days later (which was yesterday). He says he’s given up on perfection.
I can’t say that I’ve kicked the perfectionist habit that cleanly, but I do make an effort to relax my inner editor to increase my output. I think of it as “doing it right vs. doing it right now.”
This is not specific to blogging, but it’s very common with any kind of writing. I notice it when I’m writing software programs, which is somewhat understandable, but I even do it with very simple emails. I always feel the urge to check the spelling one more time, make sure everything flows, that all the bases are covered, and that everything sounds right.
In a way, this is good. After all, if you look around it’s not hard to find plenty of cases where work has been done very sloppily. Paying attention to detail is a good thing.
But one of the problems with too much of a good thing is diminishing returns. When you write your first draft, it might be 85% perfect right off the bat. A small amount of effort is all that’s needed to get it to 95%. If you check it very carefully and pay a lot of attention to how it will sound to readers, you can eventually get it to 99%. But a perfectionist will spend exponentially more time getting it to 99.1%, then 99.101%, etc.
By spending all that time trying to make an already good thing marginally better, you’re depriving yourself of the chance to make many more good things. Which would you rather have: one post that’s 99.44% perfect, or five posts that are 95% perfect? And here’s the kicker: the world probably won’t appreciate your perfectionism. Show someone a 95% post against your 99.44% pure masterpiece, and they might not be able to tell which is which. They might even prefer the other one.
While this principle is commonly observed in writing, it can be seen everywhere. Anytime someone says it’s not a good time to have kids (year after year after year), or they’re not good enough to start competing in some sport or hobby (year after year after year), or they don’t have enough information to try a business idea they’ve been thinking about (year after year after year), they’re stuck in the trap of waiting for the time to be right. Guess what—the time will never be right, so you can’t let that paralyze you.
I’m not saying to be careless. I’m saying to be aware of the trade-offs and strike a balance between “right” and “right now.” People tend to err heavily on the side of doing things “right,” and then realize far too late that they haven’t done very many things. Relaxing your standards a bit can help you crank up the output and get far more done for the same effort.
On another note, can someone explain to me why a low posting frequency would force someone to unsubscribe?