Posts Tagged ‘Myers-Briggs’

MBTI Trial Week 2: Sensing (Recap)

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

I’ve just finished week 2 of my Myers-Briggs trials. This week focused on sensing.

I was really surprised to see how hard this was. I didn’t think it would be nearly as tough as the extraversion trial, but it proved to be much harder. Fortunately though, I said I would judge myself on effort, not results.

Some psychologists consider the sensing/intuitive dichotomy to be the most important of the four. I can see how that could be true. I’m not particularly one-sided here according to my MBTI results, but I found it impossible to turn off my intuition (and remember that intuition here has nothing to do with mystical insight, which I don’t have at all).

Since I wasn’t able to stop using intuition, I tried to simply use more sensing. I tried to notice details by deliberately shouting out what I saw, heard, etc (some people must have thought I was crazy). While this felt kind of weird, it had the pleasant side effect of letting me realize that I had always walked right past this great smoothie place and never noticed it. Yogi Berra was right: “You can observe a lot just by watchin.”

I happened to have a dentist appointment, and of course it was easy to focus on what I was seeing, hearing, and feeling. It was just a cleaning, but if I had gotten the drill, it would have helped the experiment.

I thought the best part of sensing would be the whole “live for the moment” thing, so I tried to make every little thing seem special. When I ate an apple, I thought, “This apple is really sweet and crunchy. I can feel the vitamins and fiber coming into my body. I won’t always be able to eat apples, so for now, this apple is all that matters.” Yes, this got tiring very quickly, because it just didn’t come naturally.

One way to look at it is that sensors are grounded in reality while intuitives have their head in the clouds. But that’s where I want my head. Reality bores me.

Another interesting experiment, but I’m glad it’s over.

MBTI Trial Week 2: Sensing

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

In week 2 of my Myers-Briggs trials, I’ll be focusing on sensing. Sensing and intuition refer to the way we prefer to take in information.

  • Sensors rely on what their five senses tell them. They’re detail-oriented and well grounded in reality and practicality.
  • Intuitives pay less attention to the raw data coming from their five senses, and more attention to their interpretation of it. They look at the big picture, patterns, connections, and future possibilities. (While the word intuition is often used to refer to psychic flashes, that’s not what we’re talking about here.)

I thought this would be an easy trial, because I’m not too far on the intuitive side. I don’t consider myself to be impractical or adverse to detail at all.

For years, I did my taxes with pen and paper, not even using a calculator because I liked adding and subtracting by hand. I also did my taxes twice each time: once by rounding amounts off to the nearest dollar (which the IRS encouraged) and once without rounding (which the IRS allowed), to see if it made a difference. That’s about as far to the sensing side as you can get. (I eventually started using a calculator, and then TurboTax as my situation got more complicated.)

I’ve done one day of my sensing trial, and I’m finding it very hard to turn off my intuition. What you see when you look at a sunset is supposed to tell you whether you prefer sensing or intuition. Today I saw a sunset, and I tried to see it like a sensor by thinking about what color the sun was, what time it was, how the days are getting shorter, etc. But whenever I see a sunset, I always hear Will Smith’s watch beeping in I Am Legend, telling him to hide because the monsters are coming out soon. I hear that every single time.

I was working on the sensing vs. intuition section of The Personality Puzzle when I read Brip Blap’s post big picture, little picture. He said:

“One of the most apt criticisms you could make of the writing I do on brip blap would be that I’m awfully big picture. I like to think in terms of grand goals (‘achieve perfect work/life integration, have a perfect lifestyle, achieve financial independence’) without attention to the detail to support that (‘fix your credit score, maximize your tax credits’, etc.).”

When I read that, I realized that his focus on the big picture is exactly why I like his blog. I’m interested in finance, but I had a hard time finding finance blogs I like because so many of them like to overload you with details, most of which I’ve already known for years. Of course, many people like that kind of stuff, and sensors are in fact the majority.

Since I’m on this topic, let me give you a quick list of the best finance blogs for people who prefer intuition over sensing:

(In alphabetical order)

1. brip blap – personal finance, wealthbuilding and the journey to financial freedom. Not purely about finance, but it’s all good. Steve has written about many interesting things, such as how he lost 100 pounds (meaning weight loss, not a drop in his British stocks).

2. erica.biz – Erica Douglass shows you how to make millions! She’s a number cruncher, but she also has huge aspirations for herself and the world. Selling her web hosting business for $1.1 million was just a start.

3. Sentient Money – Financial intelligence for an ever changing world. Chad is very heavy on details, but he’s really good at seeing what the data means. He’s also an INTP like me, so you know he must be cool.

Jon Morrow’s magnificent blog OnMoneymaking.com would have been on this list, until he sold it.

What was I talking about? Oh yeah. I’m going to approach this trial by thinking about what new things I should do, not what things I should stop doing. So for example, I’m not going to change the posts I write, because that wouldn’t be good for anyone. I’ll just be adding some sensing on top of my normal activities.

I don’t mean to come off as all anti-sensing, because there are definitely some great sensing role models, such as Tim Ferriss (a pretty clear ISTP in my opinion) and Darren Rowse (probably an ISFJ). I’m just having a hard time keeping the upside of sensing in mind. However, there are plenty of overly intuitive freaks who have absolutely no connection to reality. Still, I find imagination so much more interesting than facts.

I’m not exactly sure what to do in this trial, but today I made a point of describing what my senses were telling me. Just talking to myself and saying “Those leaves are red” or “This apple is crunchy.” Yeah, that’s pretty obvious, but it’s just to get into the habit. By being more grounded in the physical world, I hope to develop more of a “live for the moment” attitude and not think so much about the future.

Today I read two ebooks about SEO, which I’m sure tends to be much more interesting to sensors because of how much it relies on keyword data. One of these ebooks was Fast Track for Blog Success by Kathy Hendershot-Hurd. It was available for free for a short while, and I got it just in time, but unfortunately not in time to tell you about it while it was still free. It’s now $24.95, and it explores the keyword usage of two blogs, showing why one was sold for a much higher price because of its SEO.

The other ebook was the second incarnation of Naomi Dunford’s Ninja SEO School. I had previously read the first version, but not the new one. To be fair, this was no help at all in my sensing trial because Naomi is a super intuitive. However, that’s what makes her ebook so refreshingly entertaining as well as informative.

As before with my extraversion trial, my goal is not to switch completely to sensing, but just to make an honest effort to use far more sensing than usual. Obviously it has its benefits, so I just want to try to experience them. Go sensors!

MBTI Trial Week 1: Extraversion (Recap)

Monday, October 13th, 2008

I’ve just finished week 1 of my Myers-Briggs trials. This week focused on extraversion.

The timing of this experiment helped me tremendously. Since I’m on a mini-retirement, I have a lot more free time. That made it much easier to spend more time with other people, because I still had plenty of time to myself. If I was still working, it would have been ten times harder.

Even so, it’s a good thing I decided to judge myself by effort instead of results. Despite my efforts to talk more than any reasonable person should, I still had someone ask me, “Why are you so quiet?” Oh well, I tried. My main difficulty is that I find it so hard to talk when I have nothing to say. I just can’t get random words to come out of my mouth.

While I confirmed that I like introversion a whole lot better (as I expected), there’s one particular aspect of extraversion that I think is worthy of consideration by introverts. Introverts tend to be slow to speak, and then later be mad at themselves for not saying anything. Extraverts tend to be quick to speak, and then later be mad at themselves for saying something they shouldn’t have. Of course, both extremes are bad, but maybe it’s worth trying to err a bit on the other side for a change.

I found it funny that some people didn’t want to let me be an extravert. One night I was having dinner in a bar, and the bartender wouldn’t stay and talk to me, even though he wasn’t busy. I was thinking, “Come back here! I need to make small talk to get extraversion credit!” But I didn’t force it.

Some people say that eating in front of other people makes them nervous. I don’t feel that myself, but I do prefer not to talk much when eating, because it’s just too much going on. Besides, you’re not supposed to talk with your mouth full, right?

I also don’t like loud places. I just don’t get how people can be energized from being around noise. I managed to avoid the peak times at the bars, but one place was still pretty loud. It didn’t kill me, but it’s sure not my preference. I don’t like smoky places either, but fortunately I didn’t find any.

Twitter is a great socialization tool for introverts. Even though it’s online, I think tweeting can be considered extraverted because it’s all about shallow conversations with lots of people. The reason it’s great for introverts is because you only have to follow who you want to follow, you only have to reply when you want to, and you can turn it off whenever you want. In the last week, I spent much more time on Twitter, and tweeted a lot more by relaxing my standards of what was tweet-worthy. I didn’t find this hard at all, but it came with a huge downside of taking up lots of time because of the constant interruptions.

I spent a lot of time on the phone, which was kind of hard to do. I like face-to-face conversations a lot more than phone conversations. I’m not sure why, but they feel completely different. Spending time with someone means something, but a phone call always seems like an interruption to me. Sometimes it’s a necessary interruption, but then I feel like I have to say what I have to say, and then get back to what I was doing. Even when I like the call, I always think that seeing them in person would be a much better use of my time.

One extraverted ritual that I decided not to partake in is the phone face-off. I was talking to someone when another call came through, and I pushed the “ignore” button. I told the person I was talking to that for some reason, my new cell phone keeps beeping even after you push “ignore.” When they heard I had another call, they said it was fine if I wanted to take it. But it never occured to me for a second to do a phone face-off. I think you should just talk to who you’re talking to, and let the other person leave a message. There could be exceptions, but I didn’t even know who the other person was.

Well, extraversion isn’t for me, but your results may differ. I’m glad I did this experiment, but I’m looking forward to returning to normal.

MBTI Trial Week 1: Extraversion

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

In week 1 of my Myers-Briggs trials, I’ll be focusing on extraversion.

The key difference between introverts and extraverts is where they get their energy: from themselves, or from others. If you imagine that each person is powered by a battery, an introvert charges their battery when they’re alone, and drains it when they’re with others. For extraverts, it’s the other way around.

As king of the introverts, this trial would normally be very difficult for me because I often use up my whole battery at work. After I get home, it’s a struggle to seek out more socialization. It’s nothing against anyone personally, but that’s just how introverts work; they need their alone time.

This was a shame because I used up my whole battery on people that I didn’t necessarily want to use it for, and then people I did want to use it for were greeted with my dead battery. Fortunately, I’m on a mini-retirement now, which will make this much easier.

I have a wedding to go to this weekend, so that will provide plenty of opportunities for extraversion. Other than that, I plan to spend much more time with people in person and on the phone. I’ll also practice vocalizing my thoughts before I have time to finish them, doing my thinking out loud. And Twitter will provide a good outlet for small talk.

I can’t go completely extraverted because I still need to read stuff, etc. But the point is to make a significant effort to act far more extraverted than usual. I’ve already done one day of this, but I’ll save my thoughts for the end of the week. Go extraverts!

The Myers-Briggs Trials (Don’t Try This At Home)

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

I mentioned before that I would start off my mini-retirement with a really wacky personal growth experiment. I originally got the idea from a series of ThunderCats episodes I saw in 1985, and I saw that it would tie in perfectly with my new ebook, The Personality Puzzle.

Does anyone remember the ThunderCats trials? Lion-O was the hereditary Lord of the ThunderCats, but he couldn’t be officially anointed until he passed his trials to prove his worth. He had to defeat each of the ThunderCats in their specialty, showing that he was stronger than Panthro, faster than Cheetara, more cunning than WilyKat and WilyKit, and had more mind power than Tygra.

I’ve decided to do something similar by subjecting myself to a series of trials involving the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. For the next four weeks, I’ll be acting out my non-preferences, deliberately acting against my personality just to see what it’s like.

That means that I’ll be straying from my natural type of INTP to act like an ESFJ. That is,

  • extraversion instead of introversion
  • sensing instead of intuition
  • feeling instead of thinking
  • judging instead of perceiving

I’ll be acting out each of my non-preferences one at a time. Four weeks, four trials.

While this is in no way recommended, I wanted to see if I could survive a taste of the other side. We’re supposed to embrace our preferences instead of trying to change them, but I thought it would be interesting to see things from a different perspective. If I can make an honest effort each week to act out the appropriate type, I’ll consider myself to have passed the trials.

Although extraversion would come first if I did them in order, I was planning to save it for last, since I know it’s going to be the hardest. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to start with an easy one to get warmed up? But then I remembered that the ThunderCats made Lion-O start off against the mighty Panthro, the logic being “If you can’t get past him, there’s no point in going on.” Good point. Extraversion it is, then.

I’ll write a post at the beginning of each week to explain what I’m going to do, and then another post at the end of the week to recap it. I’ll link to these posts below.

Week 1: Extraversion (recap)
Week 2: Sensing (recap)
Week 3: Feeling (recap)
Week 4: Judging (recap)
The end: Overall recap

The Personality Puzzle: Understanding What Makes People Tick

Sunday, September 28th, 2008

A few months ago, I read several blog posts that badly butchered the concept of introversion, twisting the definition and falsely assuming that it’s inferior to extraversion. Being a huge fan of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the incredible insight it offers into personality differences, I had to set the record straight.

I wrote two posts exploring the differences between introverts and extraverts, as those terms were meant to be used. One of them quickly became one of my most popular posts ever, receiving comments such as “O.m.f.g my brain had an orgasm reading this thank you so true.” The other, a guest post on Pick the Brain, hit the Digg front page. But there was still a lot more to be said, far more than could be fit into a post or even a series of posts. It had to be an ebook.

I took those two posts, quadrupled them, squared them, and put them on steroids to make The Personality Puzzle: Understanding What Makes People Tick. It covers all eight elements of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, how they interrelate to make up someone’s personality, why this is relevant and useful in our lives, and lots of examples with real and fictional people.

Plenty of information is available on the sales page, and I love that sales page so much I want to marry it. I know that some people have concerns about scientific validity, labeling, and so forth. If you do, I ask you to read the sales page before commenting, because it addresses the most common objections. If you have any other concerns, feel free to leave a comment below.

I’ll leave you with my foreword from the ebook.


I first took the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment in 2005. The company I worked at brought in a consultant to give us the questionnaire and conduct a workshop to explain what it all meant. While I found it intriguing, I didn’t really see how it was that useful.

My results came back and said I was an INTP; heavy on the I, light on the P. As we went through the workshop and learned about the different preferences, I wasn’t sure that I had been given the right type. The consultant said that sometimes the assessment isn’t accurate, and I could feel free to decide my own type regardless of what it said.

As the workshop continued, it became a running joke that I was the most indecisive person on the planet, struggling much more than everyone else to figure out what my type was. At the end of it all, everyone had confirmed their type. Everyone but me, that is. But pressed for a decision, I weakly declared myself an ISTJ. I read a description of ISTJs, and I thought, “Well, I guess that could be me, maybe.” But it didn’t feel right.

Fast forward to 2008, when I find myself meeting with a career coach to see if I’m in the wrong kind of job. At some point the MBTI happened to come up, and it took her all of ten seconds to determine that I was definitely not an ISTJ, and probably an INTP.

When I read a description of INTPs, I knew that was me, and suddenly my type made sense. Maybe there was something to the MBTI after all! I was hooked, and I began digging deeper. After reading several books and many articles, and typing people from Abraham Lincoln to Zig Ziglar, I couldn’t believe how much more there was to know than what I learned in that one-day workshop.

The MBTI originated from the ideas of revolutionary Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, in his 1921 book Psychological Types (translated to English in 1923). His work was continued by an American mother and daugher team, Katharine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers. In 1962, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was published by the Educational Testing Service. But it didn’t become popular until the mid-1980s, and it continues to be grossly underestimated today.

If everyone understood the MBTI, every dating site would have members put their type in their profile, right up there with all the vital stats. Trial lawyers would (if it were legal) use potential juror’s types to help choose the best jury for a case. Friends and family members would consider type when communicating with each other, and learn to understand each other better. In some extreme cases, the MBTI has been responsible for saving marriages. Not saving marriages in the way that people say chocolate saved their marriage, but I mean people actually filed for divorce and then changed their minds after learning how to reconcile their differences.

There are practically limitless applications of the MBTI in understanding people, not to mention understanding our own strengths and weaknesses that we might not even be aware of. While I’ll be the first to admit that type doesn’t explain everything, it sure tells us an awful lot for four lousy letters.

But for most people, it still remains shrouded in mystery and unfounded objections. I wrote this ebook to bring an understanding of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to the general public. Unlike most workshops which are fun but not that informative, and unlike most books which are informative but not that fun, this ebook is a lot of both.

I’ve pulled together plenty of heavy-duty psychological research and mixed it with real-world examples, including everyday situations as well as a look at famous people and characters. There’s really nothing else like it. Whether you’re a type theory newbie or a die-hard typewatcher, this ebook will give you a fresh and entertaining perspective on enhancing your life with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.


P.S. This ebook is really, really good. As if it weren’t worth parting with a measly $27, there’s an affiliate program paying 50% ($13.50) on each sale, so the ebook can easily pay for itself and then some.

Order The Personality Puzzle right now and finally understand what makes people tick.

Introverts And Extraverts: Can’t We Just Get Along?

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

Are you an introvert or an extravert? Either way, would you like to get along better with people of the other type? Check out my guest post on PickTheBrain, Introverts And Extraverts: Can’t We Just Get Along?

Unlike The Introverts Strike Back, this new post is pretty evenly balanced between both types, pointing out ways we can all cater to the natural preferences of other people to promote better communication and relationships.

If you like it and you’re a Digg user, please give it a digg. The Digg link is here. (Update: it’s at 132 diggs after 10 hours! Please give it a digg if you can!)

PickTheBrain is one of the fastest growing self improvement sites on the web, up to 13,510 subscribers before its second birthday. Being a wonderfully diverse site, it covers anything that people can use to live more prosperous, satisfying lives.

The Introverts Strike Back

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

Johnny Carson
Introvert Johnny Carson: He hosted The Tonight Show for 30 years.

Lately I’ve been reading a lot of posts that almost seem to describe introversion as a disease, and which purport to teach you how to be more extraverted to have a better life. It’s time we all got on the same page about what introversion is. Many people think it’s something like this:

introvert + social skills = extravert

This implies that extraverts (and yes, that’s the right spelling) are better than introverts, because the difference is simply that they have social skills in addition to everything that introverts have. In reality, it works like this:

introvert = someone who gets their energy from themselves
extravert = someone who gets their energy from others

This is the definition used by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and neither type is better. Extraverts are certainly the majority with 70% of the world’s population, but the world needs all kinds of people.

Meryl Streep
Introvert Meryl Streep: 14 Academy Award nominations, more than any other actor or actress.

While it’s certainly true that poor socials skills are more likely to be seen in introverts, stereotyping introverts as social outcasts is no more accurate than stereotyping extraverts as dumb jocks. While introverts have their challenges (as all people do), they also have their strengths (as all people do), such as independence, focus, interest in concepts and ideas, and thinking before speaking.

Thomas Edison
Introvert Thomas Edison: He held 1,093 patents in the U.S. alone.

In fact, when you look at successful introverts, you see that in most cases they succeeded not in spite of their introversion, but because of it. I doubt Thomas Edison would have invented so much if he had preferred bar hopping to being alone with his thoughts.

Jerry Seinfeld
Introvert Jerry Seinfeld: He entertained millions with a show about nothing.

The Ascending Reticular Activating System

When I was in college in the mid-90s, in one psychology class we heard about a theory concerning the Ascending Reticular Activating System (ARAS). The theory claimed that the ARAS basically worked as a pipe in the brain stem, controlling the influx of information. If a person’s ARAS was wide open, they would get plenty of stimulation just from reading a book, and they’d become an introvert. If a person’s ARAS was relatively closed off and didn’t allow much through, they would need to seek out extra stimulation, and they’d become an extravert.

Tiger Woods
Introvert Tiger Woods: The world’s #1 golfer and the highest-paid athlete in 2007.

Whether this particular theory turned out to be true or not, I found that it worked well as a metaphor. As an extreme introvert, I find that I’m never bored to be alone, and I almost never need to seek out social situations. When meeting a large number of people, or being with people for too long, I experience sensory overload, and I feel suffocated.

Socrates
Introvert Socrates: “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

This is not to say that I never want to be with people, or that I’m never energized by conversations. As with anyone else, some of my best experiences have been with other people. I just don’t require much socialization to thrive, because I have too much fun by myself.

Warren Buffett
Introvert Warren Buffett: The richest person in the world.

“How to be more extraverted”

When I see a post about “how to be more extraverted,” I think it makes about as much sense as “how to be more left-handed” or “how to be more Chinese.” Introversion is a natural condition, not something that’s determined by our behavior. If you want to talk about how to improve your social skills, and suggest that people should introduce themselves to strangers or attend group functions, fine, but don’t think that’s going to make you an extravert. If hosting The Tonight Show for 30 years didn’t make Johnny Carson an extravert, I doubt some basic socialization will do it for you.

James Dean
Introvert James Dean: He played by nobody’s rules but his own.

Furthermore, if you’re an introvert, why would you want to be an extravert? Why would you want to switch from being energized by yourself to being energized by other people? Let me try to explain why introversion makes perfect sense to me. Now remember that I’m an extreme introvert, so I can’t speak for all my people.

- I don’t see the need for untargeted socialization. Just because someone is alive isn’t enough of a reason for me to want to spend time with them. A great example of someone I don’t want to spend time with is this guy I work with. He follows me around like a puppy that needs constant attention. He comes into my cube when I’m up against a deadline, bounces a rubber ball off my cubicle walls, plays with everything on my desk, and erases my whiteboard to write his own stuff. I feel like I’m babysitting a 5-year-old. Today he came in, picked up my scissors, and cut up a Post-it note that I had written a password on. I’m supposed to be energized by this numbnuts?

James Bond
Introvert James Bond: He could tell you, but then he’d have to kill you.

- I usually like to have lunch by myself. I spend my work day interacting with other people, so I think of lunch as a time to get away, relax, think, and strategize. When a coworker wants to have lunch with me, I have to wonder why they want me to spend my free time with them, seeing as how I’m already spending 40 hours a week with them. And I find it rude for someone to just declare that they’re going to have lunch with me twice a week, as one person did.

Darth Vader
Introvert Darth Vader: He finds your lack of faith in introversion disturbing.

- People need boundaries. In yet another coworker example, one day I met a new employee and found out that we live near each other. She then asked that since she couldn’t afford a car yet, would I mind driving her to and from work every day until further notice? Are you out of your mind? I just met you, I have no idea if I even like you, and you’re going to jump straight to the chauffeur stage? Are you sure you don’t want to move in with me, or make me a mix tape?

Gandhi
Introvert Mahatma Gandhi: He pioneered nonviolent resistance and led India to independence.

- People aren’t always a good match in every respect. I recently spent some time with a highly extraverted friend of mine, who had borrowed her friend’s Nintendo Wii. We had a great time playing Wii tennis together, but after she left, she was a little upset that I continued playing without her, and preferred to play against the computer. It’s nothing against her, but she wasn’t very good, and the computer automatically increased its difficulty every time you won. She enjoys playing with another human being even though she doesn’t like the game itself. But I enjoy playing the game against a worthy opponent, regardless of whether it happens to be a human.

Mister Rogers
Introvert Mister Fred Rogers: He received a Lifetime Achievement Award for Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood, the longest-running show on PBS.

- I don’t like mindless chitchat. Recently I was working on something and had reached a state of flow, when a friend called me and started going on and on about lawn furniture. I tried to be patient but eventually had to ask if that was the only reason they were calling. It was nothing against them, but I was eager to get back to what I was doing. (By the way, this is an area where extraverts can easily have poor social skills–talking but not listening.) I’m trying to train my extravert friends to say their reason for calling up front. If they need something, ask for it. If they want to chitchat, ask if it’s a good time. I sometimes enjoy chitchat, but it would have to be during a slow time, or with someone I haven’t seen in a long time.

Albert Einstein
Introvert Albert Einstein: In his own little world he learned much about ours, becoming Time magazine’s “Person of the Century” in 1999.

- I don’t like people asking how my day was. The reason is just because I’m already perfectly aware of how my day was, so talking about it doesn’t give me anything new. If you want to talk, let’s talk about something that’s fun for both of us.

Jack Bauer
Introvert Jack Bauer: If you think introverts are pushovers, you don’t know Jack.

- I don’t like being asked about my weekend plans. When someone asks “what are you doing this weekend,” I know that what they want is an answer that will impress an extravert. But I know they’ll find it boring that I’m going to watch a movie and work on my ebook, just like I’ll find it boring that they’re going to a bar. I’ve started saying that I’m going to spend the weekend on mafia-related work. It’s just easier that way.

Steven Spielberg
Introvert Steven Spielberg: Three-time Academy Award winner, and the highest grossing filmmaker of all time.

I’m not completely without social skills. I introduce myself to new people, I communicate with coworkers in person when everyone else is sending emails, I’m pretty good at listening and sensing the other person’s mood, I know how to tell jokes, I understand comic timing, etc. Would I like to improve my social skills to the level typical of a super extravert? Sure, and if there were a pill I could take that would boost my social skills without weakening my powers of introversion, I’d take it. But I’m not going to take too much time away from things I already enjoy and things I’m already good at, in order to make tiny improvements in doing things I enjoy less that I’ll never be that good at.

Martin Luther King, Jr.
Introvert Martin Luther King, Jr.: He had a dream.

I do think everyone should have some basic social skills. You’ll find it helpful, and it’s usually not too hard to develop some basic social competence. If you happen to suffer from shyness, you should check out 20 Ways to Attack Shyness by Tina Su and Amanda Linehan. But let’s not get confused here. Shyness is a problem, but introversion is not. You can be painfully shy, but you can’t be painfully introverted any more than you can be painfully left-handed.

The Incredible Hulk

Can an introvert change into an extravert?

According to Myers and Briggs, someone’s preference for introversion or extraversion doesn’t change. I’m open to the possibility that it can change, but it certainly doesn’t happen as often as some people claim.

One example I’ve often heard is Lou Ferrigno, best known for playing The Incredible Hulk on TV in the 70s and 80s. He claims that bodybuilding took him from introvert to extravert. Since I don’t know much about him I can only guess, but I think it’s very likely that either (1) bodybuilding helped him become more social and he simply confused this with being an extravert, or (2) he was always an extravert, but it was masked by the extreme shyness he developed as a result of losing 80% of his hearing at the age of 3.

When I read posts where people say they joined some group activities and now they’re an extravert, I think “No you’re not!” They might be more comfortable in social situations, they might have good public speaking skills, they might be fun at parties, but that doesn’t make them an extravert. It’s all about where their energy comes from. Someone might be energized from a conversation, but are they really energized by the other person, or are they energized by discussing their ideas? I find it hilarious when someone writes a post about how to be an extravert, and then doesn’t respond to comments. That’s a clear sign of both introversion and poor social skills!

I am an introvert, like my father before me. This is who I am, and I would never want to change it. Are you an introvert too? If so, be proud.

For much more on introverts, extraverts, and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, check out my ebook The Personality Puzzle: Understanding What Makes People Tick.