Why Playing Financial Defense Is A Sucker’s Game
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009
When I was at Virginia Tech, their football team’s defense was a sight to behold, particularly their special teams. They blocked more kicks than anyone else in the country, enough that we were almost surprised when the other team managed to get a kick off. Very often, blocked kicks became immediate scoring opportunities. I even saw them intercept a two-point conversion attempt and run it back for a safety.
And on one particular day, the defense and special teams were in full force, working the magic we had come to expect of them. Except there was one problem: the offense didn’t show up.
Despite the sacks and despite the blocked kicks, they weren’t putting points on the board because they couldn’t do anything on offense. As one announcer said, “Special teams will only get you so far.” And Virginia Tech lost that game.
In personal finance, people who only play defense can expect to meet a similar fate. Steve at Brip Blap has often written about the importance of expanding your means, and I agree with him.
Most people focus purely on reducing spending. That’s financial defense. It’s critically important (and most people are losing that game), but it’s not the only game. There’s also the often ignored game of financial offense, or earning more than you spend, rather than spending less than you earn.
One of the most popular bits of financial wisdom is to keep your eye on the Latte Factor, which is the tendency for small purchases to add up unnoticed over time. And it’s good advice. By controlling your small expenses and investing the money you save, you can end up with lots more money than you would otherwise, perhaps a difference of millions of dollars over a period of decades.
I’m not knocking this at all. I think frugality is the most important key to financial independence. In Where Have All The Dollars Gone?, I talked about the method I used to plug my financial leaks early on, basically just keeping extremely close tabs on the Latte Factor. But there are some problems with only playing financial defense.
In The 4-Hour Workweek, Tim Ferriss says:
“This book is not about saving and will not recommend you abandon your daily glass of red wine for a million dollars 50 years from now. I’d rather have the wine. I won’t ask you to choose between enjoyment today or money later. I believe you can have both now. The goal is fun and profit.”
When you save money today in hopes of spending it later, you’re deferring a lot of your enjoyment to a future date that may never arrive. You might not live that long. Or the economy might collapse (I don’t mean a stock market correction, but something like the dollar no longer being accepted as currency). It doesn’t make sense to put all your chips on something that may or may not ever happen.
Another thing is that you quickly run into diminishing returns. The more you save, the harder it becomes to save more. You can cut out the frivolous expenses pretty easily. Then you can use some self-discipline to live below your means. But when you’re spending several hours a day looking for coupons, you have to ask yourself if it’s worth it.
Another thing is that by trying so hard to reduce your expenses to zero, you’re cutting yourself off from life. If your goal is to sit perfectly still to minimize the energy you use, oxygen you breathe, heat you generate, etc., then what good are you? Why invest so much effort into being a bump on a log?
To be fair, increasing your income is easier said than done, and I’m not going to propose how to do it in this post. I’m just suggesting that you develop both your financial offense and defense. Control your expenses, yes, but instead of trying to be totally passive to minimize your consumption, work on maximizing your output. Create value, make money, boost enjoyment, engage in life.
Photo by Stacey Lynn Photography



