Posts Tagged ‘blog’

The Blogger’s Guide To Freelancing

Sunday, February 27th, 2011

Just a heads up that Ali Luke (née Hale) has released The Blogger’s Guide to Freelancing (née The Staff Blogging Course).

I reviewed her Staff Blogging Course nearly two years ago. (Has it really been that long?) Whenever someone asked me how they could make money blogging, I would always point them to that ebook, because it’s the best way I know to get all the information you need in one place.

Now she’s updated and expanded it to make The Blogger’s Guide to Freelancing. While I haven’t read this new version, I have no doubt that it’s even better than the original.

It looks like my old discount code, HNreader, is still good for $5 off. And when you buy it, you get a $10 discount code for another ebook of hers, The Blogger’s Guide to Effective Writing. And you get a six month money-back guarantee, so there’s practically no risk to try it out.

Oh, and if you previously bought the original version, you should have already received the new one for free. If not, just leave a comment, and she’ll take care of it.

How To Protect Your Blog From Hackers

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

I had some technical difficulties with my blog recently. Some files got corrupted, and I wasn’t able to log in. I don’t know if I was hacked, but it made me wonder.

Since then, I’ve been a lot more interested in WordPress security. That’s how it goes, right? We’re not concerned about what could go wrong until something happens. But if you have a blog, there’s a good chance that someone will try to hack it someday. When that happens, you don’t want them to succeed.

John Hoff from WpBlogHost offers a WordPress security upgrade, normally priced at $49.95. From now until Thursday 5/7/2009, use the promo code “Hunter” to get it for just $24.95.

Here are some of the things included in the security upgrade:

  • Rename your database tables so they don’t start with “wp_,” making them harder for hackers to find.
  • Protect your login page from brute force password attacks.
  • Prevent other people from accessing pages and directories you don’t want them in, such as your login page.
  • Block people who attempt common hacker attacks, such as SQL injection.
  • Hide your WordPress version number, so you won’t be seen as a target if your version isn’t up to date.

Of course, nothing is 100% secure. But just like a bank is far more secure than a hot dog stand, a blog with these security upgrades is far more secure than a blog using the default installation. I highly recommend a one-time investment in this security upgrade to all WordPress bloggers. I feel way more secure now than I did before.

Whether you have a blog or not, take a minute to consider all the passwords you use online. Just because your password is a little harder to guess than “password1″ doesn’t mean it’s secure. Make sure you’re not using dictionary words, or names, or sequential numbers. Use a mix of lowercase letters, uppercase letters, numbers, and symbols. Don’t use the same password for every site, and change them periodically.

Why We’re Failing The 4-Hour Workweek

Monday, December 15th, 2008

It’s been 20 months since Tim Ferriss released his world-renowned best seller The 4-Hour Workweek. He gave us his secrets for liberating ourselves from the “deferred life plan.” We’ve had time to put it into practice. So why haven’t we?

This is the question I explore in my new free ebook, Why We’re Failing the 4-Hour Workweek (or, Reflections of a Pro Blogger). For the last two and a half months, I’ve been happily jobless as a full time blogger, and free to work on creating a permanent alternative to the 9-5. But how has it worked out?

We’ll skip right past the flashy pictures of lavish parties and six-figure AdSense checks, and get a behind-the-scenes look at the world of pro blogging. You’ll get a glimpse of the harsh realities of entrepreneurship, and the tough choices a blogger is forced to make. Perhaps most importantly, you’ll see what’s wrong with the system, and how to deal with it. Oh yeah, and it’s really entertaining too.

When you’re done reading it, leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Do you have trouble keeping up with all the demands on your time? Have you attempted a 4-hour workweek before?

Aspiring Bloggers, Here’s Your Roadmap

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

Roadmap To Become A Blogger

Back in January, Yaro Starak and Gideon Shalwick released a series of 10 free blogging training videos for beginners at BecomeABlogger.com. They were very well done, and while the information was far too basic for me at the time, I remember thinking that the videos would have been nice to have back when I was dealing with the technical challenges of setting up my blog (getting a web host, a WordPress theme, setting up FeedBurner, etc).

Now they’ve released their Roadmap To Become A Blogger, a free ebook and audio that outlines their strategy based on the “X-Factor.” (Warning: video with sound starts playing automatically. I hate that.) It’s proven to be very popular, with nearly 7,000 downloads already.

When I heard them mention the “X-Factor,” I thought it was going to be about blog mojo, but it’s not. The X-Factor is the intersection of multimedia (video, audio, online radio, and TV) and social media (Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, etc).

And this is where it kind of lost me. I liked reading it, but about halfway through it started getting very tech-heavy (beyond just normal text blogging), and I started skimming. On the other hand, if you want to tech out your blog, you’d probably like it.

On Thursday, December 4th at 4 PM EST, they open the doors to their premium membership program that teaches successful blogging. Yaro is the entrepreneurial guy, having made $70,000 from his blog in October 2008, and I don’t know as much about Gideon, but he’s the tech wizard.

Back in April they asked for feedback on their free videos, as well as input that would help them decide what to include in their paid program. Gideon said my feedback was valuable and honest, but I wasn’t chosen as the one person with the best feedback who would be rewarded with free access to the program. (I always like to win free stuff!)

Their 6-month program is $27 per month if you sign up in the first week (with bonuses for people who sign up the first day). After the first week, the price goes up to $47 a month. But the Roadmap To Become A Blogger ebook and audio is free, so there’s no commitment there.

If I were to join one of Yaro’s programs, I’d probably do Blog Mastermind. It’s considerably more expensive than Become A Blogger, but for now I don’t have much interest in multimedia. YMMV.

Happy 1st Blog Birthday!

Saturday, November 29th, 2008


Photo by Crystl

Today my blog turns 1 year old. (If you’d like to give him a present, he likes time-saving plugins.) The first birthday is a significant milestone for a person, but more so for a blog because most don’t last that long.

Not too long ago I wrote about hitting 500 subscribers, and I don’t really have anything new to add as far as blogging tips go. And I plan to give an update about my problogging, but now isn’t the time. Instead, I just thought I’d share a few stats and events from my first year of blogging.

I wrote 177 posts. That’s almost exactly one post every other day. I was surprised I had written that many, as I started off planning to post every 5 days or so. I’m still more on the Tim side of the Tim Ferriss/Gary Vaynerchuk spectrum.

I received 2,378 comments. That’s an average of 13 comments per post (counting my own), and again that surprised me. I thought that I almost always get less than 13 comments per post even now, and much less when I started. But hey, the numbers don’t lie.

I wrote 4 ebooks. (One of them will be released next week.) Ebooks are great because you can get into so much more depth than with a post, but as something gets longer, the time required increases exponentially. If I write a 2,500 word post and a 25,000 word ebook, the ebook is 10 times longer, but it probably took 100 times longer to write.

I gained 700 subscribers. A lot of people ask why anyone cares about subscribers. I agree that not every subscriber is a regular reader, but I think it’s the best metric we have for measuring regular readership. I don’t really care about page views because I’m not selling advertising or pursuing significant AdSense income, and a flood of StumbleUpon traffic doesn’t matter as much to me as gaining new readers who stick around.

I hit the Digg front page once, with my guest post Introverts And Extraverts: Can’t We Just Get Along? Though in my opinion, this was not even remotely my best post.

Average time to write a post: I don’t have an exact figure, but it’s often hours per post. This post you’re reading now was an easy one, but it takes a lot longer when I need to do some research first, or I’m forming my opinion while I’m writing, or I have to do a lot of editing, or it takes forever to find a good photo. The one that took the longest might have been The 10 Most Uplifting Songs Of All Time (fortunately, it got good traffic).

Most popular post: 10 Reasons Japan Is Better Than America. People sure can get defensive about their country. 29,000 visitors, 11 thumbs down in StumbleUpon, and several comments that had to be deleted, some calling for my deportation. Also record AdSense income.

Favorite thing about blogging: Reading comments on my posts.

Least favorite thing about blogging: Thinking up ideas for new posts much faster than I can write them. Also not having time to respond to comments and read all the posts I’d like to.

One year down, many more to go!

I scheduled this post in advance, and I’m probably not around right now. Apologies if your comment doesn’t get through moderation right away.

The Long And Short Of It

Friday, November 14th, 2008

Long and short
Photo by Robyn Gallagher

I’m thinking that I haven’t had a good angry rant in a while…

In 3 Successful Bloggers Share their Blog Tips, Darren Rowse shows us a 2.5 minute video he shot at Blog World Expo 08. He asked Jeremy Schoemaker, Steve Pavlina, and Andy Wibbels what blog tips they’d give to bloggers just starting out.

Jeremy spoke for 11 seconds. His tip was “Write content for people and not for search engines.”

Andy spoke for 12 seconds. His tip was “Pick a topic and stay with it. That is why people have success, and it’s one of the hardest things to do, but pick a topic, stick with it, and own the topic.”

Steve spoke for 99 seconds. His tip was that one way to create “great content” is to do a personal experiment, something that no one else would do, and blog about it. He then described his polyphasic sleep and raw foods trials.

I thought Steve’s input was by far the best. It’s a tip you don’t hear all the time, and he went into some detail. You might not want to use that tip, but at least he had something significant to say. (I also thought it was interesting because I happened to be doing my Myers-Briggs trials at that time.)

I’m not criticizing Jeremy or Andy for just giving a quick tip. They were just there enjoying the convention and hadn’t planned anything to say. If it were me, I might have only spoken for a few seconds as well. But a sound bite doesn’t make for a very useful video.

“Write content for people and not for search engines.” Good tip, but we’ve heard it a million times before.

“Pick a topic, stick with it, and own the topic.” This could have used some more explanation. Does he mean you need to have a very focused niche? Does he mean not to combine unrelated topics on the same blog? Does he mean that you’re stuck with whatever topic you originally picked, even if you decide you made a mistake? I have no idea if I agree with him, because I’m not sure what he meant.

Again, I have nothing against them for saying those things. What I want to talk about is the reaction to the video. Here are some comments people left:


“Thanks so much for sharing this! Another title for this video can be: ‘Show me how you talk and I’ll tell you if I’ll read it or not!’

Steve, buddy… to the point man! To the point!!!!

I’ll certainly visit the other two blogs.”


“Steve short and sweet please
it was a great video, I really liked Jeremy’s tip”


“Steve Pavlina likes to talk.

‘Own the topic.’ is a cool point.”


“As usual, Steve Pavlina presented a lengthy blah blah blah!”


Is this what the microwave generation has come to? A minute and a half is way too long for a video, but a one-sentence cliche is terrific? What will the next generation be saying?

A sentence? I don’t have time to read a whole sentence!

**unsubscribes**

Some things take some time to get across. A movie is supposed to be about 2 hours. A 5 minute movie would be pointless. Oh wait, I forgot, even a 2.5 minute video is too long for some people. Maybe The 1 Second Film would be more to your liking.

I can imagine Thomas Jefferson reading his draft of the Declaration of Independence to the Committee of Five: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and…” At which point Benjamin Franklin shouted “GET TO THE POINT!” Or do you think he realized that some things are worth taking some time for?

I used to have a hard time believing that statistic that 42% of all college graduates never read another book after college. It doesn’t seem so unbelievable now. But if you don’t have the patience to read a whole book, check out Book-A-Minute. They ultra condense classics, science fiction, and children’s stories so you can read books in just a few seconds, sometimes less than one second.

Don’t get me wrong, short is sometimes fine. I’ve written a number of little postlets myself. Sometimes you can get everything across in 250 words. Some people have even created great blogs from consistently short posts, when it fits their style and the subject matter. But some things are a little more complicated, and a short post might not do it justice.

The Introverts Strike Back was 2,000 words because that’s what it had to be. I’d rather write one strong 2,000 word post than ten 200 word posts that don’t really say anything. My interview with Akemi Gaines on Akashic record reading was 5,000 words because that’s what it had to be. I split it into two posts so it didn’t take too long to read either half. When I wrote about the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, I wrote 25,000 words because that’s what it had to be. This was way too much for a post, so I made it an ebook. So the format sometimes needs to change to fit the length better, but I don’t understand this extreme sensitivity to length.

Maybe you like short posts, so you seek out blogs that keep their posts around 200 words. But do you know what’s even shorter than 200 words? 0 words! Why read blogs at all? It’s faster not to. Then you’ll have more time to…um, do nothing?

Oh, I’m sorry, should I not be assuming you made it this far? It’s been nearly 1 kiloword to this point. If this is too long for you, you can follow me on Twitter instead. They limit you to 140 characters, about 2 or 3 sentences. No doubt some Web 4.0 startup is hard at work, trying to devise a platform that compresses language even more. I guess I could have summed up this post with “long=ok.”

Best Business Model: Blogging Vs. Network Marketing

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

This post is 2,200 words. If you don’t have time, just read the last paragraph.

Naomi Dunford at IttyBiz is releasing her Online Business School tomorrow (Wednesday), and I’ll probably write a separate post about that. But since I was planning to write this post anyway, I figured now was a good time, since it ties into Naomi’s stuff.

You have bills to pay, and they require money to pay them. In the U.S., the “normal” way to make money is through a job. But sometimes we forget that’s not the only way. Another way is to have your own business.

What exactly is a business? Well, it depends on who you ask. Some people say there are “businesses” and then there are “real businesses,” but the definitions vary. And some “businesses” are really no different from jobs, like if someone performs exactly the same tasks as the employees they work with but they think they’re so cool because they receive a 1099 instead of a W-2.

There are many reasons not to have a job, but the best one is freedom from a boss, being able to work on what you want, when you want. Of course, there are also several drawbacks, or everyone would do it. In a traditional business, you have to deal with things such as coming up with a product or service to sell, getting financing, managing employees, and dealing with tremendous stress.

Let’s say you wanted to open a Taco Bell franchise. Some people will say a franchise isn’t a real business, but anyway, it should be easy, right? I mean, someone else has already figured out a formula that works, so you just need to connect the dots and color, right?

Well, first of all, there’s a money problem. You’ll need a minimum net worth of $1 million and minimum liquid capital of $360,000, with the ability to secure additional financing to cover the rest of the initial investment, which is estimated to be $1,290,000 – $3,088,000 (source). That’s not feasible for most people. You’d also be working around the clock, and who knows if you’d be any good at it, or even like it? That seems to be considerably less freedom than you’d have with a job.

But traditional businesses involve issues like this. In this example, the main problem was the money. In another business, the main problem could be inventing products that are needed but don’t exist yet. Or the main problem could be convincing companies to dump their professional service providers and take a chance on you instead. People do these kinds of things all the time, but they’re beyond most people, and even if you have what it takes, it’s never a sure thing. And even if it all works out, you may find that because it consumes your life, you don’t own the business, the business owns you.

So a lot of people look to options other than traditional businesses. The idea is that maybe you don’t need to have a building and employees and inventory and such, but you just want something that’s a little easier to manage. Something that a normal person could realistically do and which would actually improve their life. The two business models I’ll talk about here are blogging and network marketing. Which is better?

Network marketing

When people hear about network marketing, they often say, “Wait, that’s a pyramid scheme!” Sorry, but that’s just ignorant. Pyramid schemes are illegal, so they couldn’t operate in plain sight for decades, even trading on the New York Stock Exchange, without anyone noticing and shutting them down.

A pyramid scheme is something like a chain letter, which is basically a game to pass money around. People get a letter in the mail from someone, send money to them, then send the letter to five other people and ask them to repeat the process. Does this sound like a legitimate business? It’s not–there’s no product or service being sold!

In network marketing, as in a traditional business, you make money by selling a product or service. The only difference with network marketing is that you can also sponsor people and get a percentage of their sales as well. For some reason, no one considers an affiliate program to be a pyramid scheme, even though it’s the same thing.

The fact that there’s a pyramid structure is no different from any company that has a president, vice presidents, directors, managers, and peons. What’s the alternative? Having every employee be an equal partner?

The reason network marketing has a bad reputation is because of questionable practices of some people and companies. For example, some companies required people to buy thousands of dollars worth of products in order to join. I agree that lots of bad things happened and still continue to happen, but that reflects on the parties responsible, not the business model itself. In 1979, the FTC ruled that network marketing was a legal business model. In Europe, network marketing is still called multi-level marketing, so I guess that term was never tarnished over there.

It’s kind of a shame that we have to spend that much time just establishing that network marketing is legit, but anyway…

The point of network marketing is that a system is in place, and you just have to run with it. You don’t have to go into the lab and invent a product, you don’t have to worry about payroll for your employees, etc. You just need to market the product. The idea is that as a human being, you can establish better relationships with potential customers one-on-one than the company could do by running ads on TV. And if you bring enough people on board, you can build up a residual income, living off your commissions from the people you sponsored.

There are a few problems here though. One is that there are a lot of dumb products being sold by network marketing companies, like overpriced miracle juice. And if the product is crap, so is the business. A lot of people like that stuff, but I never wanted to be a juice salesman. But there are lots of options. I used to sell financial products (and give away free financial education).

Another problem is all the rah-rah hype that companies love to promote, when they really need to be spending a lot more time on training about, oh I don’t know, maybe HOW TO MARKET THE PRODUCT? But this turned out to be a good thing for me.

I didn’t really go anywhere in network marketing until I stumbled onto Leaders Club. They’re a meta network marketing company, where the customers are themselves network marketers, looking for practical information on how to market their respective businesses. I signed up just because I wanted to try out their leads, but I was really impressed and decided to promote them when I found out they had their own affiliate program.

Once I made that switch, I started doing much better. Because my prospects had already joined a business they liked and just wanted some help with it, they needed a whole lot less convincing. I won the top sponsor award several times (sponsoring 5+ people in a month), and I was probably in the top 2% of all network marketers.

But, as in many fields (blogging for example), the top 2% doesn’t mean very much. I was never remotely close to making a living from it. And you have to deal with a lot of really apathetic people.

People would go to my site, put in their info, say they desperately needed help with [advertising/getting web traffic/finding prospects/whatever] so they could [get out of debt/quit their job/spend more time with their family/whatever]. But then they wouldn’t return my calls or my emails, or if they did they’d usually only be interested in solutions that were really easy and wouldn’t cost anything. Yeah, good luck with that.

I just don’t have a lot of patience for people who have no ambition at all. It’s like, “Dude, this is YOUR business that YOU asked for help with. Do you want to stop wasting money with ineffective advertising, or do you want to go back to watching ‘Prison Break?’”

And the whole residual income thing is nice, but it depends on what other people do. I sponsored 40 people before one of them sponsored a single person.

The verdict:

I wouldn’t recommend joining a traditional network marketing company unless you really like sales. Liking the product isn’t nearly enough, because most of your efforts will have nothing to do with the product. You’ll either be buying leads or generating them on your own, contacting them, finding out what they’re looking for and what motivates them, finding out if they have enough time and money for a business, and convincing them that they want to join with you instead of anyone else. Nobody will ever be serious, and many people won’t even be polite, so you have to be very patient and persuasive, and have a very thick skin. You really need to have superhuman unconditional compassion for all people. How do you know if you have it? If you have to ask, you don’t. Most people don’t. I sure don’t.

On the other hand, meta network marketing companies are entirely different, because your prospects have already been sold on the concept of network marketing, they’re already in a business they like, and they just want it to work better. It’s 1,000 times easier to work with these people, but it will still be frustrating. People will still drag their feet and forget that they’re the ones who need you. But it’s not that hard to make some money, as far as businesses go.

Blogging

Well, that doesn’t sound too encouraging, does it? What about blogging, how does that compare?

When I say blogging, I don’t necessarily mean running a blog that’s monetized by Google AdSense. That’s one possibility, but I’m taking a much broader view here. For our purposes, blogging will mean any venture where a blog is the driving force. It can be monetized by third party advertising, affiliate products, ebooks, coaching, services, whatever. You’re free to swap income streams in and out at any time, because they don’t define the business. It’s not like you have to shut down your “AdSense business” to start your “coaching business” on the same blog.

At some point, a blog that’s a business could shift to being a business that happens to have a blog. There’s no clear-cut place to draw the line, so I won’t be too precise in defining blogging. “Blogging” here will just mean getting paid in one way or another for writing stuff on your site. For that matter, that site doesn’t technically need to be a blog. (Oh, and in case you didn’t know, blogging is legal.)

The thing people like about blogging is that it really lets them be themselves. It’s fun to pick any topic you want, write about it, and discuss it with other people who stop by to comment. And then you get to promote it by finding other people like you with blogs, and commenting on what they have to say. What could be better?

Well, yes, it’s very fun. Maybe that’s why 1.4 new blogs are created every second. But that fun comes at a price. Making money from blogging is much harder than most newcomers expect.

You can’t just write posts on your blog, put up some form of monetization, and wait for the checks to roll in. You need to get readers, and that means you need to spend a lot of time promoting your blog. Commenting on other blogs, writing guest posts, using Twitter, and stuff like that has to be a priority. It’s fun doing that, but it’s also very time consuming, and it could easily be a full time job by itself. And even full time, it would still take a long time to get readers.

How many readers do you need? Lots. Millions. Well, not millions, but it seems like that. And many bloggers will just keep writing posts and wonder where the money is. Unfortunately, it will never be there without lots of readers, and that’s why so few people are making a living from it.

The verdict:

Making a living from blogging is much harder than making a living from network marketing. However, for me, blogging is way more fun. To make up some numbers here, blogging is 10 times harder but 1,000 times more fun, which makes it worth it to me. And so that’s the direction I’m heading in, taking the financial hit in order to do something that I like a lot better.

But how do you actually make a living online? Naomi Dunford is answering that question tomorrow (Wednesday) with the release of Online Business School. That’s her home study course that explains how she’s making over $200,000 this year from six income streams: consulting, services, selling physical stuff, ebooks, niche sites, and affiliate marketing. She’s released some free content over the last few days, and the real deal goes up for sale tomorrow. Am I buying it? Of course. I didn’t even have to wait for the sales page.

I Am Problogger, Hear Me Roar

Sunday, October 5th, 2008


Photo by rodrigo senna

After being laid off from my software development job last Friday, I’m now a problogger! The last time this happened, I was “unemployed.” Now, I’m a “problogger,” which sounds infinitely cooler.

I’ve never liked the fact that the term is defined by something you don’t do (have a job) instead of something you do do (reaching certain blog milestones). Hehe, I just said doodoo. :) I also find it interesting that people write it as one word because they’re used to it as a domain and blog name. You wouldn’t write “he’s a protennisplayer,” right? Anyway, the term problogger has caught on, so I’ll stick with it.

What does being a problogger mean for me? I’m looking at three options.

1. Go back to work immediately

For close to two months, I suspected I would be laid off on or shortly after October 3. And every time someone asked me how the job search was coming along, my answer was “I haven’t started yet.” That was still my answer on Friday after being laid off.

My boss looked at me like I was crazy, and said, “Well, you really need to get on the ball now. You need to decide what your specialty will be within .NET development, because there are lots of opportunities…” I didn’t want to tell him that I stopped caring a long time ago.

Anyway, I made it to the end, so I get severance pay. I didn’t want to accept another job before then and miss out on the severance, but now it would be reasonable to look for another job. Still, I don’t think I’m going to.

In A Year Without Paychecks, Part 2, Akemi Gaines wrote about her life shortly after quitting her admin job in Oregon:

“There were mornings I woke up and wondered what to do. Occasionally, I thought of looking for temp jobs. Then I thought why the heck would I get another admin job in Oregon – if that was what I wanted to do, I didn’t need to quit. Duh.”

I love that Duh at the end. And that’s exactly right. I’ve been looking forward to being laid off (even dropping hints that they didn’t need me) so I didn’t have to work anymore. If I went back to work right away, then what did I need to get laid off for? Duh. Besides, you’d have to be crazy to want a job.

2. Stay retired forever

The opposite extreme is staying retired forever. By “retired,” I don’t mean lying comatose under a pile of empty beer cans, just not having a 9-5. I’ll talk more about that in the next section.

Tina Su has recently ditched her day job, getting by mainly on the income from her blog’s 400,000 monthly page views. But I’m not close to that yet.

I’m going to be looking into some different options for making money, such as freelance blogging (which I already do some of), other kinds of writing or editing, tutoring kids in math, day trading (just kidding!), etc. (Not sure how much you’re allowed to do outside of blogging without endangering your problogger status.)

But I keep reminding myself that the goal isn’t just to make money. I have to be careful not to pursue paths that will involve doing things I don’t like too much, for not too much money. Even if it’s not a job, it could very well be worse than one. Which leads me to the option I’m leaning towards…

3. Have a mini-retirement

The concept of mini-retirements was popularized by Tim Ferriss of The 4-Hour Workweek. Most people are participants in the deferred life plan, where you work for decades and then get to enjoy your life just in time to die. The idea of mini-retirements is that you split up your work life by taking short stints of temporary retirement, such as by living in another country for a few months. Tim’s life is now basically one mini-retirement after another, funded by the proceeds of his nutritional supplement business that he works on for 4 hours a week (thanks to masterful delegation, elimination, and automation).

Tim previously made up to $70,000 a month in different business ventures, but was working himself to death. Now he’s basically retired and does everything he wants for less than $5,000 a month. He says he’s not a multi-millionaire, nor does he particularly care to be one.

After reading his book, people sometimes say something like, “That’s so great that he stopped chasing money, because he realized that all that matters is happiness.” But if they think that, they apparently didn’t understand the book very well.

The only reason he can do everything he does is because he makes enough money to pay for everything without working (OK fine, working 4 hours a week). He doesn’t have to be a multi-millionaire because he found a way to create the passive income of one. (Generating $5,000 a month in dividends from an S&P 500 index fund takes roughly $5 million. There are better ways of doing it, but this is just an example.)

Likewise, everyone seems to love the story of the Harvard MBA and the Mexican fisherman, and they think it’s a great example of how money doesn’t matter. Except they’re missing the fact that the fisherman can only do what he does because he makes enough money from his hobby that he doesn’t have to work. I invite you to go fishing and see if you can support your family that way.

Every loves to say that money doesn’t buy happiness. True, but it does buy freedom.

My mini-retirement

Fortunately, I have enough money to buy a little freedom, so it looks like I’ll be taking a mini-retirement. Most people associate mini-retirements with travel, but I won’t be going anywhere (or at least, that won’t be the focus). I’m just not that into travel, and I already went to Japan and Charleston, SC this year, so I don’t feel the need.

One common problem of having too much time on your hands is the high risk of boredom. Many people don’t know what to do with their newfound freedom, and need to go back to work just to have something to do. That seems like an awful solution to me.

Tim Ferriss talks about “filling the void.” You suddenly have a bunch of empty time, and you have to fill it with something. The goal is not to be idle all the time, but to be active doing what you want to do. If you can’t think of anything better to do with your time than running in the rat race, then exactly how are you better than a rat?

I’m sure it will be an adjustment, but I’m not worried about being bored. For one thing, even if I suck at this and end up craving a 9-5, (1) at least I’ll know that I need to figure out what’s wrong with me, and (2) I’ll be a lot more enthusiastic about working after a break.

Besides, I think I have plenty to keep me busy. Because I’ll have a lot more physical and mental energy, I’ll be able to take up interesting projects that I just wasn’t motivated enough to do before.

I haven’t even begun my first day of retirement yet (since I’d have the weekend off anyway), but already I’ve experimented with my first vegetarian meal. Of course, everyone has vegetarian meals all the time (I never have meat for breakfast), but I mean consciously choosing vegetarian when meat was readily available and would have been my normal choice, and real food, not like when I went to a restaurant a few years ago and had ice cream for dinner.

I had a vegetarian burrito at Chipotle, and it was good. I could have easily made it vegan too–I don’t think I would have missed the cheese and guacamole. It was pretty enormous, and there’s actually a Smaller Burrito at Chipotle Petition you can sign. I’d just as soon make it two meals though.

I’m not saying I’m trying to become a vegetarian, but I’ve heard enough that I was interested in doing some experiments, though I didn’t have the energy to try before, because I don’t really like vegetables. But now I know that rice and beans and such seem like normal food to me. It’s a first step.

This is just one example of something I’m trying. My next post will announce a really wacky personal growth experiment I’m going to be doing. I don’t know everything I’m going to be doing in my mini-retirement, but I know it will be interesting (for me at least). I’m sure I’ll be writing about some of it, but at the same time, this blog isn’t a personal journal.

Time management will be a challenge. It’s easy to manage your time when you don’t have any, or when all you want to do is unwind after a stressful day at work. It’s a lot harder to manage your time when you have all the time in the world. You become overconfident in your ability to get everything done, and then at the end of the day you find that you didn’t actually do anything. I’m going to be whipping up a new todoodlist or two to stay on track.

One trap I’m going to be sure to avoid is spending too much time blogging, meaning both reading and writing (yes, even as a “problogger”). I used to often have huge chunks of free time at work that I could spend reading blogs, sometimes the full eight hours. But now, I have to always be asking myself, “Is this the most important thing I could be doing?” Blogging will still be a very important part of my day, but I want to do a lot more.

I’ve always had a hard time justifying mini-retirements because the mathematician in me would think about compound interest, and all the money I’d really be losing by not working. On the other hand, I’ve always been putting aside money for retirement, and now I’m going to be doing exactly what I’m saving for. There will always be jobs available, but I think I have to take this time to enjoy life now.

Here I am writing this on a Sunday night, and for the first time in a long while, I’m not dreading tomorrow. :)

P.S. Assuming FeedBurner is working correctly, I hit 600 subscribers yesterday. I guess I’m like John Chow: “I gain subscribers by telling people how many subscribers I gain.”

How To Realistically Get 500+ Blog Subscribers

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

“Don’t be too proud of this blogosphere behemoth you’ve constructed. The ability to gain subscribers is insignificant next to the power of engaging them.”

- Darth Vader (paraphrased)

I’d like to be able to write a post with a title such as From 0 to 2000+ Subscribers in 90 Days (by Tina Su) or The One Word That Helped My Blog Grow To 800+ Subscribers in 17 Weeks (by Christine O’Kelly). Both are great posts from two of my favorite bloggers. They gained tremendous momentum early on, and told us exactly how they did it.

But I can’t use a title like that because my blog didn’t grow nearly that fast. “From 0 to 500+ Subscribers in 10 Months” just doesn’t have the same ring to it. On the other hand, people might be able to relate better to a more realistic story of subscriber growth. At any rate, I can only share what I know, so I’ll talk about how I got 500+ subscribers in 10 months.

Be prepared to run a marathon

First of all, if you’re a new blogger with 10 or 20 or 50 subscribers, 500 might seem like an awful lot. It isn’t.

If I had 50,000 subscribers, I could just post anything that was reasonably well-optimized for social media, and watch it rocket to the front page of Digg. I could post a review of any product, then sit back and watch hundreds of people buy it. At 500 subscribers, even minor successes take a lot of work.

Blogging is not a sprint, but a marathon. If you always keep that in mind, you’ll do much better than the people who expect overnight success and get discouraged when they’re faced with reality. For every Tina Su, there must be thousands of bloggers who never make it to 10 subscribers.

However, things get easier as you move along. In the beginning, you have to figure out so much all at once. How do you install WordPress? What theme do you want to use? How do you fix the CSS? What plugins do you need? What is FeedBurner? This is all stuff that you have to deal with instead of growing your blog. Maybe that’s why I only had 3 subscribers after my first full month.

But these obstacles vanish soon enough, and then you really start blogging. And you stumble in the beginning, because you don’t know how to write posts or how to promote them. But you learn from experience, and you get better. The better you get, the more you grow, and then you benefit from exponential growth. I’m sure I’ll have a much easier time going from 500 subscribers to 1000, than I did going from 0 to 500. In either case it’s 500 new subscribers, but it’s a lot easier when you already have 500 readers to link, Digg, and Stumble.

Luck

I don’t think luck plays too much of a role in growing your blog. Tina and Christine may have been lucky, but they also had great content so they were prepared to capitalize on whatever luck came their way. But what is luck anyway?

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.”

- Seneca

Looking at the chart at the top of this post, you can see where my one lucky break was. On February 24th, I released an ebook called The Zen of Blogging, and it was well-received by my 20 readers. On April 11th, I succeeded in getting ProBlogger to link to it, which put it in front of 40,000 more. This happened right before I left for vacation, when I had 44 subscribers. I came back to find I had 205.

Yes, that was a lucky break, and I’d have more like 150 subscribers now if it hadn’t happened. But what did it take for it to happen?

  1. I had to get the idea for the ebook. (Most people don’t spend time brainstorming ideas for ebooks.)
  2. I had to write the ebook. (Most people don’t put forth the effort to write an ebook.)
  3. I had to get Darren Rowse to link to it. (This wasn’t as simple as just asking; you can read how I did it in my post Persistence Isn’t Using The Same Tactics Over And Over.)
  4. People had to like it enough to subscribe. (It could have easily gone either way.)

Preparation, meet opportunity.

Some bloggers seem to be successful just because they were in the right place at the right time. But most people wouldn’t have done what they did, even if they were in the same place at the same time. It always takes more work than a sane person would be willing to do.

Look at Darren Rowse. It might be easy to think that if you had happened to learn what a blog was back when he did, that you would have started ProBlogger and you’d be a 6-figure blogger today. But would you? Would you have been willing to post 20+ times per DAY like he did across several blogs, not knowing whether any of them would ever take off? Hindsight is 20/20. What opportunities are you not seeing right now?

I’ve had smaller lucky breaks here and there, but as you can see in the chart above, they’re all tiny blips in the grand scheme of things. Even my 15 minutes of fame on ProBlogger will appear as a tiny blip eventually. Focus on the journey, not on each step.

What am I doing wrong?

I see it all the time. People say things like, “I’ve been doing everything I’m supposed to–posting great content consistently, responding to comments, leaving comments on other blogs, etc. I’m putting in lots of effort, but not seeing results. What am I doing wrong?”

Well, I don’t know. I’ve seen a lot of people grow their blogs much faster than mine. In some cases, their content was fantastic, and I thought they were deserving of thousands of subscribers. In other cases, I just couldn’t figure it out. Just like how I can’t figure out why Facebook is so popular. But I do know this:

“It’s supposed to be hard. If it wasn’t hard, everyone would do it. The hard…is what makes it great.”

- Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own

And this:

“The brick walls are not there to keep us out. The brick walls are there to give us a chance to show how badly we want something. Because the brick walls are there to stop the people who don’t want it badly enough. They’re there to stop the other people.”

- Randy Pausch

A few people will have outrageous success. Most won’t. I can’t really tell you why. I do know that we have to take responsibility for our success though.

If you’re not getting ad clicks, the problem isn’t that people aren’t clicking your ads; the problem is that you’re not making your ads clickable enough. If you’re not getting stumbles, the problem isn’t that people aren’t stumbling you; the problem is that you’re not making your posts stumbleable enough. And so on. Keep that attitude, and you’ll find the answers.

There’s a lot of conflicting advice out there about blogging. In How To Write Blog Posts With Confidence, Monika Mundell, with 750 subscribers, talked about how much time someone should spend on a post:

“I’ve heard certain bloggers state that they take between 2-3 hours for each blog post to complete. In my humble eyes, this is crazy. While I occasionally spend a couple of hours on a post, most of the time I get them written within 20 minutes to 1 hour. Even 1 hour is too long…”

Meanwhile, Tina Su spends about 8 hours on a post, and sometimes as much as 20 hours.

20 minutes vs. 20 hours. Who’s right? They both are. There’s no “right” amount of time to spend on a blog post, because bloggers have different niches, target markets, and objectives. Which is the “right” country to live in, the U.S. or Australia? More on this later.

Every blog’s growth comes down to two things: content and marketing. There’s nothing else. You need stuff for people to read (content), and you need people to read it (marketing). Most people do a bad job at both, which means less competition for you.

Content

There are lots of blogs out there about how to write great content, so I’ll mostly defer to them. I just want to say what I think is the most important key to writing great content: find your niche.

What does that mean? Niche in the sense of what topic you write about? No, it goes deeper than that.

Writer Dad says he doesn’t have a niche, and that’s certainly true in the traditional sense. But I think he has a very specific niche. He’s writing for people who like about 1 post per day, about 500 words, broken into lots of short paragraphs, with lots of interaction in the comments section, and most importantly, his unique writing style. Name another blogger who’s similar. Can’t think of one? That’s because he’s the only one in his niche.

What’s my niche? Personal development? Yeah, right. That’s the niche for people who don’t like niches, because everything is personal development, from Abraham Simpson to the Akashic records, and that’s just the As. My topics are all over the place, but the people I’m writing for are by definition those who like to read what I write. So as long as I write differently from other people, that’s a niche. Name another blogger who’s similar. Can’t think of one? That’s because I’m the only one in my niche.

Better and worse are subjective. Don’t worry about being better, worry about being different, about being you. You’re inherently unique, so just let your personality come through. That will be better, for the right people.

Look at metablogging as a niche. There are so many blogs about blogging out there, and most of them are a faint shadow of ProBlogger. That niche is completely saturated. But that didn’t stop Copyblogger, Remarkablogger, and Blogging Without A Blog from carving out their own sub-niches, did it? There’s no more room in that niche for copycats, but there’s plenty of room for trailblazers.

That’s what I meant about whether you should spend 20 minutes or 20 hours on a post. Whatever you decide, that’s part of your niche, and there aren’t any wrong answers. I’m somewhere in between. I couldn’t have written this post in 20 minutes, but I also need to get to sleep at some point.

One other thought about content. Many new bloggers will come up with great ideas for a post and just hold on to them, wanting to save them for when they have lots of readers. Don’t. This comes from a fear that you’ll run out of great ideas. But if you ever run out of great ideas, you’re dead anyway.

Marketing

The best content in the world doesn’t matter if no one ever sees it, and that’s where marketing comes in. Marketing consists of everything that gets your content in front of people: commenting on other blogs, guest posting, SEO, etc. Much has been written about this as well, so I’ll be brief.

I mainly do my marketing by commenting on other blogs. Unfortunately, I’ve found that to be a full-time job. It’s fun to read other blogs and comment, but at this moment, I’m looking at 247 unread posts in my RSS reader and I don’t know when I’m going to be able to get that down to 0. I’m probably going to have to just scan these posts without intending to comment. Less fun, but much faster.

However, I’ve found a couple of marketing methods that are much more efficient. One is guest posting on Pick The Brain, which is bringing me lots of traffic for relatively little effort, compared to commenting on blogs. The other is Steve Pavlina’s forums. I haven’t posted very much in them, but from my limited experience they seemed to be great traffic generators. However, it takes significant time to keep up with them.

These are just methods that have worked for me, and they might be useless in your situation. The point is to keep trying things and see what works. I’m going to keep commenting on blogs, but I also need to be efficient with my limited time.


Well, there you have it, a realistic overview of going from 0 to 500 subscribers. If you haven’t had enough yet, check out my interview on Jamie Harrop’s blog. Now, onward to 1,000 subscribers.

Win A Copy Of ProBlogger

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

ProBlogger

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This contest allows people to win a copy of ProBlogger the book, not a copy of ProBlogger the blog or a copy of ProBlogger the person. ProBlogger the blog is copyrighted by ProBlogger the person, Darren Rowse. Darren Rowse is a registered trademark of the Rowse family of North Fitzroy, Australia. Consult an attorney if this is confusing.

Want to learn how to create and market a blog with the potential to generate a six-figure income? Darren Rowse and Chris Garrett present a practical guide in ProBlogger: Secrets for Blogging Your Way to a Six-Figure Income. You’ll learn how to:

  • Choose subject matter that works for you
  • Handle technical issues
  • Examine different ways your blog can earn income
  • Evaluate your blog’s success
  • Keep content fresh and interesting
  • Use your blog to generate income indirectly

I could go ahead and write a review, but it’s so much easier to just link to FreelanceSwitch’s ProBlogger review.

Here’s your chance to win a copy of this famous book, mailed anywhere in the world. All you have to do is:

1. Subscribe to my blog via RSS or via email.

2. Write a post that links to my main blog page and to this post, so that your readers can have a chance to enter. This can simply be a quick mention at the end of an unrelated post.

I’ll be looking at the trackbacks on this post to see who does this. If your trackback doesn’t appear by the next day for whatever reason, just leave a comment with the URL of your post.

3. Leave a comment below and chime in on the definition of an A-list blogger. I’ve been looking for what makes someone A-list or B-list, but no one seems to offer a definition. I found Are You an A-List Bloglebrity?, which ranks a blog by the number of inbound links in the last 6 months, but I think it’s far too generous, calling me B-list.

I propose this definition: 2,000 subscribers makes you B-list; 20,000 subscribers makes you A-list. Leave a comment and tell us your definition.


If you entered my last random drawing, you automatically get one entry in this contest, but you can complete steps 1-3 above to get another. Non-winning entries in this contest will not roll forward to the next one, because this contest takes hardly any effort at all.

You have until 11:59 PM EST Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 to enter. At that time, a winner will be chosen at random from all entries received. Good luck.