<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rules For Providing Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/</link>
	<description>Stop sucking and live a life of abundance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:26:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>@ Sterling, remember Skellie&#039;s butterfly post where she said that when you reach 500 subscribers, you can back off on marketing? Apparently you still need to do some at that point. I wish we could ignore marketing and just focus on content, but I think we&#039;ll always need to have a balance.

@ JEMi, I vote for the &quot;great minds&quot; thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sterling, remember Skellie&#8217;s butterfly post where she said that when you reach 500 subscribers, you can back off on marketing? Apparently you still need to do some at that point. I wish we could ignore marketing and just focus on content, but I think we&#8217;ll always need to have a balance.</p>
<p>@ JEMi, I vote for the &#8220;great minds&#8221; thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>why, yes Hunter!  I&#039;m &quot;in yo&#039; head&quot;

*woooooo*  (twilight zone music)


orrr its just that great minds think alike :-D

&lt;em&gt;JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.inmyheels.com/stripped-vulnerability-in-love/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stripped:  Vulnerability In Love&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why, yes Hunter!  I&#8217;m &#8220;in yo&#8217; head&#8221;</p>
<p>*woooooo*  (twilight zone music)</p>
<p>orrr its just that great minds think alike <img src='http://hunternuttall.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><em>JEMi | Tips for Life, Love, You&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.inmyheels.com/stripped-vulnerability-in-love/' rel="nofollow">Stripped:  Vulnerability In Love</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sterling &#124; bizlift</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>sterling &#124; bizlift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Hunter, I appreciate your last comment to Catherine.  It reminds me of Skellie&#039;s recent post about trying to grow by focusing on quality content, but she realized that you have to play the social network game if you want to continue to pick up new subscribers.

It&#039;s a tough balancing trying to maintain standards of quality and originality while also participating on the social bookmarking merry-go-round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunter, I appreciate your last comment to Catherine.  It reminds me of Skellie&#8217;s recent post about trying to grow by focusing on quality content, but she realized that you have to play the social network game if you want to continue to pick up new subscribers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough balancing trying to maintain standards of quality and originality while also participating on the social bookmarking merry-go-round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>@ JEMi, are you reading my mind? I was just writing about being &quot;insanely useful&quot; and couldn&#039;t remember where I saw that phrase. You mentioned &quot;value-packed,&quot; which I know comes from Skellie. They&#039;re both great things to be, and you&#039;re developing a reputation for both!

@ Catherine, I just recently found out that you get more stumble power for stumbling with the masses. It&#039;s pretty sad, because it defeats the purpose of social media. Sometimes I&#039;m in the mood for stumbling and go specifically looking for something to stumble. But I won&#039;t stumble something that&#039;s not special in some way (though it need not be extraordinary--I can&#039;t set my standards too high because unfortunately I have to play the game).

Yes, I wrote the rehasher myself. Glad you got a kick out of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ JEMi, are you reading my mind? I was just writing about being &#8220;insanely useful&#8221; and couldn&#8217;t remember where I saw that phrase. You mentioned &#8220;value-packed,&#8221; which I know comes from Skellie. They&#8217;re both great things to be, and you&#8217;re developing a reputation for both!</p>
<p>@ Catherine, I just recently found out that you get more stumble power for stumbling with the masses. It&#8217;s pretty sad, because it defeats the purpose of social media. Sometimes I&#8217;m in the mood for stumbling and go specifically looking for something to stumble. But I won&#8217;t stumble something that&#8217;s not special in some way (though it need not be extraordinary&#8211;I can&#8217;t set my standards too high because unfortunately I have to play the game).</p>
<p>Yes, I wrote the rehasher myself. Glad you got a kick out of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath Lawson</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Hi Hunter - I thought your blog post rehasher tool was a brilliant wakeup call for many people.

This is my take on the whole situation.  My mediocre posts get stumbled - because they&#039;re interesting to a particular group.  And I don&#039;t think it&#039;s because they&#039;re good posts.  I think it&#039;s because the people who stumble them know they&#039;re the type of posts that get stumbled a lot, so they&#039;ll get stumble juice for stumbling them.

The exception was my Sky TV post which many of you stumbled out of the goodness of your hearts.  And that was great.  It&#039;s brilliant that people will fight back against the big corporations.

But, I have noticed something about StumbleUpon which I do not like.  If a blogger is popular, they can blog on a hackneyed topic, with no original slant and it will get stumbled to death.  Some people have said it&#039;s because they have a popular blog, but i think that is utter tripe.  I truly believe it&#039;s because people will get more stumblelove (eg more people visiting there own blogs) if they stumble these posts on popular blogs.

I&#039;ve seen stuff I&#039;ve written completely rehashed - and i wouldn&#039;t mind if it was an original slant, but often it isn&#039;t.  And it&#039;s usually the &quot;popular bloggers&quot; who do it.  And i have read many posts after reading some of Barbara&#039;s - usually a couple of weeks later and they&#039;re just like posts she&#039;s written - fair enough, in the authors own words, but with no particularly different angle.

Your rehasher was a classic though - did you make it yourself?

&lt;em&gt;Cath Lawson&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SuccessPasscode/~3/254432720/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Business Partnership - Is It Financial Suicide?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hunter &#8211; I thought your blog post rehasher tool was a brilliant wakeup call for many people.</p>
<p>This is my take on the whole situation.  My mediocre posts get stumbled &#8211; because they&#8217;re interesting to a particular group.  And I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re good posts.  I think it&#8217;s because the people who stumble them know they&#8217;re the type of posts that get stumbled a lot, so they&#8217;ll get stumble juice for stumbling them.</p>
<p>The exception was my Sky TV post which many of you stumbled out of the goodness of your hearts.  And that was great.  It&#8217;s brilliant that people will fight back against the big corporations.</p>
<p>But, I have noticed something about StumbleUpon which I do not like.  If a blogger is popular, they can blog on a hackneyed topic, with no original slant and it will get stumbled to death.  Some people have said it&#8217;s because they have a popular blog, but i think that is utter tripe.  I truly believe it&#8217;s because people will get more stumblelove (eg more people visiting there own blogs) if they stumble these posts on popular blogs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen stuff I&#8217;ve written completely rehashed &#8211; and i wouldn&#8217;t mind if it was an original slant, but often it isn&#8217;t.  And it&#8217;s usually the &#8220;popular bloggers&#8221; who do it.  And i have read many posts after reading some of Barbara&#8217;s &#8211; usually a couple of weeks later and they&#8217;re just like posts she&#8217;s written &#8211; fair enough, in the authors own words, but with no particularly different angle.</p>
<p>Your rehasher was a classic though &#8211; did you make it yourself?</p>
<p><em>Cath Lawson&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SuccessPasscode/~3/254432720/' rel="nofollow">Business Partnership &#8211; Is It Financial Suicide?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>you know, I try to write with the rule &quot;be insanely useful&quot; which I think I saw resonated on Problogger somewhere.

When I google something, I&#039;m looking for those pages that&#039;s value packed with info and often times, you find a lot of watered down stuff.  

So when I write, I try to think about answering questions that generally come up in the topic.  Of course I can&#039;t do it all but I always try.  I think of it as building quality on my site brick by brick with the hope that people start to think &quot;hmmm.. maybe I can find this on InMyHeels&quot;
That.  Would be awesome.  

I do my research, respect my sources, avoid half a page quotes from another blog, and most importantly I write in my own voice.  If you like one post, you&#039;ll love &#039;em all because thats me through and through.

&lt;em&gt;JEMi &#124; Tips for Life, Love, You&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.inmyheels.com/waiting-to-live/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Waiting to Live&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, I try to write with the rule &#8220;be insanely useful&#8221; which I think I saw resonated on Problogger somewhere.</p>
<p>When I google something, I&#8217;m looking for those pages that&#8217;s value packed with info and often times, you find a lot of watered down stuff.  </p>
<p>So when I write, I try to think about answering questions that generally come up in the topic.  Of course I can&#8217;t do it all but I always try.  I think of it as building quality on my site brick by brick with the hope that people start to think &#8220;hmmm.. maybe I can find this on InMyHeels&#8221;<br />
That.  Would be awesome.  </p>
<p>I do my research, respect my sources, avoid half a page quotes from another blog, and most importantly I write in my own voice.  If you like one post, you&#8217;ll love &#8216;em all because thats me through and through.</p>
<p><em>JEMi | Tips for Life, Love, You&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.inmyheels.com/waiting-to-live/' rel="nofollow">Waiting to Live</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>We have three good responses here about what value is.

J.D. says bloggers need to make him think, feel, or act. That&#039;s certainly true. If a post makes you think, feel, or act (in a positive way), that means it&#039;s worth something.

Thomas says we need to have energy. I have to agree with that too. If someone writes with energy, they&#039;re going to make you think, feel, or act. When there&#039;s no energy, it makes you wonder if the person just felt like they were due to post.

Barbara suspects that value means different things to different people, which I guess has to be true. So she holds herself to her own set of made up rules.

I think you&#039;re all right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have three good responses here about what value is.</p>
<p>J.D. says bloggers need to make him think, feel, or act. That&#8217;s certainly true. If a post makes you think, feel, or act (in a positive way), that means it&#8217;s worth something.</p>
<p>Thomas says we need to have energy. I have to agree with that too. If someone writes with energy, they&#8217;re going to make you think, feel, or act. When there&#8217;s no energy, it makes you wonder if the person just felt like they were due to post.</p>
<p>Barbara suspects that value means different things to different people, which I guess has to be true. So she holds herself to her own set of made up rules.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re all right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s mostly about energy. If you write about your passions you will have access to large 
amounts of energy. Everybody wants more energy for themselves, and by reading a blog where you can 
almost feel the energy, you hope that some of it will rub off on you, or that you can somehow 
learn to access the same level of energy. Energy is valuable because you can use for whatever you 
want.

&lt;em&gt;Thomas&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://growingsoul.com/2008/03/14/how-i-saved-a-little-piggy/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How I Saved A Little Piggy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s mostly about energy. If you write about your passions you will have access to large<br />
amounts of energy. Everybody wants more energy for themselves, and by reading a blog where you can<br />
almost feel the energy, you hope that some of it will rub off on you, or that you can somehow<br />
learn to access the same level of energy. Energy is valuable because you can use for whatever you<br />
want.</p>
<p><em>Thomas&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://growingsoul.com/2008/03/14/how-i-saved-a-little-piggy/' rel="nofollow">How I Saved A Little Piggy</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Swafford</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Swafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Hi Hunter,

First of all, thank you for the link love.  

So far, I have found no &quot;rules&quot; for blogs/blogging.  

I venture to guess the &quot;rules&quot; are different to different people, however, when it comes to blogging, if we (as bloggers), don&#039;t make a conscientious effort to fill blogosphere with valuable and trustworthy information, blogosphere will soon become a cyberspace trashcan.  Like so much in our everyday life, it could also become a &quot;problem&quot; that will be left for our children, and grandchildren, to try and clean up.  

With the internet replacing most research materials, millions may read what we write, believe what we write, and use what we write to make decisions in their everyday lives.  If we steer them wrong and begin producing mediocre content, who&#039;s responsible if they make the wrong decision.  Is it them, for not being smart enough to &quot;do their homework&quot;, or is it us for &quot;posting just to post&quot;?

As a blogger, I take what I publish very seriously.  I have my own set of &quot;made up rules&quot;, and can only hope that others hold themselves to a high standard as well.

&lt;em&gt;Barbara Swafford&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/253459578/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NBOTW Shares From Years Of Experience&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hunter,</p>
<p>First of all, thank you for the link love.  </p>
<p>So far, I have found no &#8220;rules&#8221; for blogs/blogging.  </p>
<p>I venture to guess the &#8220;rules&#8221; are different to different people, however, when it comes to blogging, if we (as bloggers), don&#8217;t make a conscientious effort to fill blogosphere with valuable and trustworthy information, blogosphere will soon become a cyberspace trashcan.  Like so much in our everyday life, it could also become a &#8220;problem&#8221; that will be left for our children, and grandchildren, to try and clean up.  </p>
<p>With the internet replacing most research materials, millions may read what we write, believe what we write, and use what we write to make decisions in their everyday lives.  If we steer them wrong and begin producing mediocre content, who&#8217;s responsible if they make the wrong decision.  Is it them, for not being smart enough to &#8220;do their homework&#8221;, or is it us for &#8220;posting just to post&#8221;?</p>
<p>As a blogger, I take what I publish very seriously.  I have my own set of &#8220;made up rules&#8221;, and can only hope that others hold themselves to a high standard as well.</p>
<p><em>Barbara Swafford&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/253459578/' rel="nofollow">NBOTW Shares From Years Of Experience</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D.</title>
		<link>http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hunternuttall.com/blog/2008/03/the-rules-for-providing-value/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Value&#039;s in the eye of the beholder.

I think blog authors do their best when they write from experience and passion.  At the end of the day, your blog&#039;s value is either you or your topic.  If it&#039;s about you, then the value is your perspective.  If it&#039;s about the topic, then you&#039;re either providing insight or action or your take on the topic.

If you make me feel, think or act, you&#039;re adding value.

&lt;em&gt;J.D.&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBookShare/~3/253056555/getting-out-of-slump.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Getting Out of a Slump&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Value&#8217;s in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p>I think blog authors do their best when they write from experience and passion.  At the end of the day, your blog&#8217;s value is either you or your topic.  If it&#8217;s about you, then the value is your perspective.  If it&#8217;s about the topic, then you&#8217;re either providing insight or action or your take on the topic.</p>
<p>If you make me feel, think or act, you&#8217;re adding value.</p>
<p><em>J.D.&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBookShare/~3/253056555/getting-out-of-slump.html' rel="nofollow">Getting Out of a Slump</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
